With every threat we face, whether natural or manmade, we have to do a serious threat assessment, including looking at all angles and possible scenarios and ruling out the most improbable outcomes. However, when it comes to media reporting about medical and military threats, the public gets a very limited, overly simplistic view that lacks intellectual credibility. Such appears to be the case of the Ebola Virus threat.
The reports from the U.S. Government and the mainstream media has been spotty, confusing and an insult to the intelligence of the average person. For instance, no official has offered a credible explanation as to why the U.S. sent 3,500 troops to West Africa to “assist” in containing the Ebola threat. A true assessment of the situation would lead a common sense approach to focus on sending teams of highly trained medical personnel, accompanied by a minimal number of security forces just for general protection of the medical personnel. A private security company with expertise in international security would suffice. Sending in thousands of armed military personnel suggests an invasion in an early stage of planning. Given European and American history in Africa, particular with many incidences of nightmarish medical experiments on helpless Africans, sending in an army only exacerbates the problem and should raise red flags as to the true nature of American involvement in West Africa.
Before continuing any further, also note that credibility is important for any government to have when it expects its citizens to trust it. Unfortunately, the United States has eroded that credibility, with trust in government reaching all-time lows under Bush II and Obama. It was dishonest about Libya, not just Benghazi, but also in the overthrow of Gadhafi. It was dishonest regarding Saddam Hussein and the WMD lie and character assassination lies. It lied about the various medical experiments it carried out on its own citizens over the past 120 years (and more). It was dishonest about the need to go to war in WWI against a Germany which it was an ally of in the immediate years leading up to 1914. It was dishonest about the Pilgrimage to America and the smallpox blankets given the Native Indians as “gifts,” the Revolutionary War, its participation in the mid-1800s wars against Russia (Crimea) and China (Opium), American Slavery, Pearl Harbor (WWII), Korea, Vietnam, the Cold War, JFK, MLK, RFK, Vaccines, Influenza (especially the Weaponized Flu Nightmare of 1919), Polio, compulsory school immunizations (if they are supposedly good for your health, then why make them mandatory?), Cancer, Swine Flu, SARS, AIDS and now Ebola, it appears.
How did we get to this scary point with Ebola? If you follow only the reasoning from the West, Africans, who have never been plagued by the array of deadly diseases that seem to correspond to Western “medical research and preventive healthcare, are poor, pathetic creatures who can only survive through the help of “experts” of European descent. Never mind the horrors brought to Africa via the imperialist colonization terrorisms of the 1800s. If we are to believe the onslaught of viruses and deadly pathogens visited upon the “poor, weak” Africans, the Africans should have been killed off long ago if Ebola and HIV always existed in Africa. This logic is quite similar to the logic we are told to ascribe to mandatory school immunizations. Mankind has existed for millennia, yet somehow, in the 20th century, we were told that every school age child must be immunized to prolong life and to eliminate outbreaks. Most of us simply trusted the government and medical “experts” without questioning why all of a sudden does man need these vaccines to live, and what exactly is in those syringes? Are we being told the truth about the average lifespan of men and women before the 20th century?
A deeper question is, why does it take U.S. Army Medical researchers to work on infectious diseases far away in Africa in order to “protect” Americans from bioterror weapons? Why not send those same research teams to Israel, Italy, South Africa or Canada? One anti-conspiracy theorist hit piece written by Politifact.com (again, why a political fact-tracking website to weigh in on medical research controversies?). The article goes to great lengths to try to silence those who would dare brainstorm questions about the truth behind the Ebola outbreak. Here’s an interesting snippet:
The U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases also sometimes works in the facility, Garry said. Part of its mission is to prevent viruses like Ebola and Lassa fever from being used deliberately as bioterrorism agents against soldiers and civilians. It did not respond to our inquiry by our deadline.
This quote embodies logic that is eerily similar to the government deception mentioned in George Orwell’s 1984, where War is Peace, and governments have bureau names that are the opposite of their intent. So the U.S. department of Defense is actually always on the offensive, as we are seeing in Ukraine, Hong Kong, and the so-called Arab Spring Nightmare that started in Tunisia in Dec. 2010 and pretty much levelled the most powerful Islamic nations on the planet. Back to the above quote: Here, Politfact spends much of its credibility dismissing claims that the U.S. government would deliberately create bioterror weapons in Africa. We are simply told that the US Army MRIID has the goal of preventing Ebola from becoming bioterrorist weapons. But we are not told who the enemy is. If it is Al Qaeda and ISIS, and other offshoots like Boko Horam, then it has been easily and well documented that Al Qaeda and all of her children are Hollywood-style creations of the West, particularly Western intelligence (with the help of the entertainment industry and mainstream news outfits like CNN).
So why would the U.S. and her Western allies go to all this trouble to “research” Ebola in Sierra Leone, Nigeria and Liberia (which is the land America carved out to help freed slaves escape the horrors of slavery that the U.S. government foisted on them)? Could it be that Sierra Leone is a major diamond mining country, a large producer of titanium, gold, bauxite and rutile? And of course, Nigeria is a major oil powerhouse, creating a class of billionaires and multimillionaires. Even before Ebola became a problem for the country, the West engineered the “kidnapped girls” crisis on the Nigerian government, giving the West a pretext for spying on Nigeria from neighboring Chad, along with the help of Israeli intelligence. When that production didn’t produce the desired results, the Ebola virus became Nigeria’s problem.
Coming back to the U.S., one has to ask, why were Dallas and Atlanta chosen as Ebola Ground 0 for America? Atlanta is where the Centers for Disease Control is located, along with Emory University nearby. Dallas perhaps was chosen because it is one of the fastest growing mega business cities in the country with a large number of affluent Christians and mega churches. And in general, Texas is a magnet for people looking for jobs. A perfect metropolitan area for the engineers of such nightmarish experiments to carry out various quarantine and police state strategies. With all of the money in Dallas, it is also a good test bed for stirring up enough fear to influence people to demand vaccines, provided by Big Pharma (investors may want to take note if you invest in pharmaceutical companies). Right now, the hospital at Ground 0 in Dallas, Texas Presbyterian, is pretty much a quarantine candidate, as we are seeing play out with the apartment complexes of the 2 Ebola victims. If you think it through, the powers that be are already considering contingency plans to seal of the entire Dallas-Ft. Worth area to “protect” the rest of the country, and basically relocated the quarantined citizens to internment camps. For this, they would need plenty of troops, just like the ones we see marching off to West Africa.
The answer to the title of this article is now, hopefully, apparent. It is time to brush up on being prepared, with the ability to live off the grid and under the radar. Vote to throw out Washington officials who are steering this country away from morality and towards a love of money. Vote to overturn laws that give military and police officials more power than taxpaying citizens. We don’t have to accept a world where a government can engineer a deadly virus like Ebola. But the level of propaganda among Americans and those in the West has grown greatly in recent decades. Will the cries warning of the coming Ebola nightmare fall on deaf ears?
A number of Cameroonian troops have gone missing after Boko Haram militants attacked the northern town of Bonderi on the border with Nigeria, a Cameroonian security official said Thursday.
“We are certain that the assailants are Boko Haram militants,” the official told Anadolu Agency. “We are saddened to have lost some of our men.”
The official added that a number of Cameroonian military vehicles had been seized during clashes with the militants, which erupted in the early hours of Thursday.
He went on to say that reports on the incident – and the casualties that accompanied it – had yet to be finalized.
This is the second attack this month on the border town by suspected Boko Haram militants.
On August 6, the town’s police station came under rocket attack.
Chinese police have opened fire on Tibetan demonstrators in southwestern China, wounding 10 people, after the Tibetans protested against the detention of a respected village leader, a Tibetan rights group said.
The crackdown in the Ganzi prefecture of Sichuan province, a flashpoint for Tibetan protests against Chinese rule, underscores simmering tensions between Tibetans and the Chinese authorities.
The UK-based International Campaign for Tibet (ICT) group, citing several Tibetan sources in exile, said late on Wednesday the area “is now under tight control, with local Tibetans including the elderly and children subject to interrogation”.
Photographs that circulated on social media showed Tibetans with “serious wounds on the head and torso” after the incident, the ICT said.
The United States said it was concerned by reports that Chinese authorities had opened fire on protesters.
“We continue to call on the Chinese government to permit all citizens, including Tibetans and other ethnic minorities, to express grievances freely, publicly, peacefully, and without fear of retribution,” a State Department statement said.
Human rights activists say China tramples on religious freedom and culture in Tibet, which it has ruled with an iron fist since People’s Liberation Army troops “peacefully liberated” the region in 1950.
As we blogged about in our coverage of a small, mostly white Michigan township who got fed up with its formerly friendly police department being turned into an over reactive , militarized police army, more and more of America’s police departments are transforming into anti-constitutional local armies, reminiscent of German Stazi and Soviet police state units of the WWII era. A lot of white readers and viewers of the events unfolding in Ferguson, MO, will likely get distracted by the fact that this case involves a white police officer shooting an unarmed black teen multiple times, and some will even side by default with the white officer, thinking, “there’s no way an officer will just shoot an unarmed person for NO REASON.” We ask that such readers set aside that layer of distraction and look at the deeper issue particularly the aftermath with small town America looking like a Middle East police state: Do we want our police departments responding this way?
CNN has been showing scenes of overly militarized police officers roughing up and arresting journalists who did nothing wrong at all, other than to not leave quickly enough from a McDonald’s where there was no wrongdoing and no protests! Peaceful protesters were commanded to leave, despite the fact no one called police to break up the constitutionally sound protests. More scenes of military style heavily armed tanks and snipers in Army green looking uniforms in America is quite un-American and civil lawsuits should be brought against the police forces for denying the right to free speech and protest. This kind of protest is exactly what the founding fathers of America had in mind when they drafted the constitution, so to see a small American town turned into a senseless military zone over the violent response of an officer to a teen simply walking in the middle of a street is mind boggling and nightmarish.
The site AddinctinInfo.org said it best:
The story in Ferguson is not unique. If anything it is tragically common. But, somehow, this is different. Somehow, a line has been drawn in the sand, where people are going ‘No More.’
Our police have been turned from Sheriff Andy Taylor to Judge Dredd – Judge, Jury, Executioner. In 2012, police shot and killed 607 people. We outfit our officers with military gear, handing them automatic weapons, and then expect some result other than death to occur.
The actions of the Ferguson police department cannot be tolerated in civil society. The police are public servants, not lords or soldiers. The demilitarization of the United States must begin.
How embarrassing can this get? Just look at how RT (Russia Today) covered it:
Through its 1033 program, the Pentagon offers hundreds of millions of dollars of surplus military equipment to police forces throughout the US. St. Louis County, which encompasses Ferguson, is part of the program, according to Michelle McCaskill, media relations chief at the Defense Logistics Agency.
“St. Louis County law enforcement agencies received twelve 5.56 millimeter rifles and six .45 caliber pistols from the Department of Defense between Aug. 2, 2010, and Feb. 13, 2013,” a Missouri public safety official confirmed to USA Today.
As RT has previously reported time and time again, local police forces across the United States have benefited from the militarized mindset of the post-9/11, “war on terror” era, as wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and funding from the likes of the US Department of Homeland Security have resulted in a mass proliferation of military-grade weaponry.
How the interaction between Michael Brown and the police officer should have gone…
Officer: Hey guys. You know you shouldn’t be walking in the middle of the street. It can be dangerous to you and drivers.
Michael Brown: [No response]
Officer: [Makes a mental note of the interaction]. Did you guys hear me?
At this point, let’s assume Michael Brown and his friend ignore the police again. The officer can either (a) cite them for jay walking, or whatever the equivalent law is for Ferguson, MO, or (b) ignore the offense for now but assume that a lot of people in that particular neighborhood probably walk in the middle of the street. With (b), the officer can then plan a community outreach to go to the neighborhood and hand out flyers about street safety or approach local community leaders and schools (when in session) to educate kids on using common sense in walking in the middle of the street. The idea here is that the alleged offense does not rise to the level of requiring an angry, hostile police response to citizens.
For those who would automatically side with the police officer in question, with the assumption that Michael Brown MUST have deserved this treatment, then the logic of such a conclusion would have to be consistent with the following scenarios involving violent police over reactions:
- Cop comes home after a long day and ignores his wife and goes straight to his man cave or other room to be alone. His wife complains that he is too distant. He punches her, then pulls a gun on her. Did she deserve it because she dared question a police officer? What if the cop later says he was defending himself against an aggressive spouse?
- A cop responding to a school classroom where the teacher thinks a misbehaving child needed someone with legal authority to instill some fear in the student. Once on the scene, the officer allows his emotion to get in the way and after unsuccessfully getting the child to calm down, he uses his tazer gun on the student, causing burns. Was the cop justified because he says the child grabbed for his tazer gun while trying to calm the student down?
- An underpaid cop takes a bribe from a wealthy criminal to look the other way. Is the cop justified because the city underpays him?
- A sexually deviant cop decides to molest a child. Did the child deserve this because a police officer wanted to molest the child?
These scenarios serve to show various ways an officer of the law may behave unethically but some in society may be likely to give them a pass on such behavior. Police strategy should involve community outreach over a long term. Clearly, when you have a situation where over 67% of the population of a city is black, and the police force sworn to serve them is majority white, the temptation to avoid community outreach is likely to be higher as the populace can be seen as “them” instead of “us.”
This situation has been further exacerbated by the fact that Ferguson Police did not release the name of the killer officer. Yet they were quick to publicize the names of the people they arrested. If the killer officer was man enough to shoot to death an unarmed teen with his hands up, then he should be man enough to face the public he serves and let the public know his background.
Fortunately, after a series of very tragic mistakes by the Ferguson Police Dept, the Governor of Missouri and the State Trooper Captain have done the right thing and took over from the Ferguson Police, emphasizing non-militarized community outreach instead of heavy-handed, unconstitutional military responses to the exercise of freedom of speech and assembly. Now will other militarized police forces around the country follow this example?
For more on the sad trend of American police departments becoming militarized zones, please read the following and make your voices heard in your community today:
World Bulletin / News Desk
The hedge funds suing Argentina over its 2002 debt default are an “international mafia” out to wreck the country’s finances, the government said on Thursday, pumping up the rhetoric in a battle that is squeezing the struggling Argentine economy.
With its peso currency at record lows, foreign reserves down more than 5 percent over the last year and vast shale oil and gas resources laying undeveloped in its southern Patagonia region, Argentina is desperate to tap foreign financing.
But the debt case, which stems from Argentina’s default on nearly $100 billion in sovereign bonds 12 years ago, is blocking its access to the international bond market.
“Today we are in the hands of an international financial power comprised of small, voracious interests that form a real international mafia,” Jorge Capitanich, the Cabinet chief and government spokesman, told reporters in Buenos Aires.
Many Argentines side with their government against a group of hedge funds that rejected the country’s 2005 and 2010 debt restructurings in which holders received less than 30 cents on the dollar.
They call themselves Islamic State (IS). They pretend to be a new caliphate.
But their behavior is radically un-Islamic… even satanic. And their so-called caliphate is actually a false-flag operation against Islam.
A better acronym would be US (Unislamic State). The initials are apt, since Unislamic State is the creation of the US and its regional allies. Their mission is to smear Islam, spread sectarian strife, destabilize the Middle East, and provide an excuse for endless US intervention in the Islamic world.
Former al-Qaeda commander Nabil Na’eem has exposed Unislamic State as a creation of the US and its Persian Gulf puppets. The intellectual authors of this Fourth Generation Warfare operation are neoconservative Zionists and New World Order satanists. The victims are the people of the Middle East… and the American people, who have been bled dry by the 9/11 wars.
Na’eem has explained that the camps in Jordan where Unislamic State was created, armed, and trained were “supervised by US Marines.” He adds that the group’s funding is “all-American” and that more than one thousand of its terrorists are being treated in hospitals in Tel Aviv.
Feminista Jones spearheaded the National Moment of Silence vigils taking place around the country, which she makes clear are separate and apart from Anonymous’s call for a “National Day of Rage.”
“To have Anonymous come along and say let’s turn this peaceful moment into a day of rage is highly problematic,” said @FeministaJones. “The last thing we need is for police around America showing up because they anticipate Anonymous hackers showing up with their Guy Fawkes masks,” she said.